RSS

Testate Estate of Josefa tangco v. De Borja, G.R. No. L-28040, August 18, 1972.

25 Jul

[REYES, J.B.L., J.]

FACTS

The testate estate of Josefa Tangco alone has been unsettled for more than a quarter of a century. In order to put an end to all these litigations, a compromise agreement was entered into. Tasiana assailed the validity of agreement applying the doctrine in Guevarra v. Guevarra. Jose de Borja pointed out that the Rules of Court allows the extrajudicial settlement of the estate of a deceased person regardless of whether he left a will or not.

ISSUE

Whether or not the heirs may enter into compromise agreement to convey their share of the inheritance even before the probate of the will.

 

RULING

YES. The ruling in Guevarra v. Guevara, relied by the appellant, which declared invalid a compromise agreement which disposes of the estate before probate of the will is not applicable here. Successional rights are transmitted from the moment of the death of the decedent (Art. 777). In this case, the clear object of the contract was merely the conveyance by Tasiana Ongsingco of any and all her individual share and interest, actual or eventual in the estate of Francisco de Borja and JosefaTangco. The transaction was binding on both in their individual capacities, upon the perfection of the contract, even without previous authority of the Court to enter into the same.

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on July 25, 2017 in Case Digests, Civil Law, Succession

 

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: